Thursday, November 30, 2006



Watched both L'Eclisse and The Passenger this week.

The Passenger wins. The Special Features on L'Eclisse make it very worthwhile (and if he hadn't created the first two films in the trilogy the quiet, creepy, domestic weirdness would be unique), but L'Eclisse does not compare to L'Avventura, or The Passenger. If I had any interest in film criticism or theory, I would go into detail. But I don't and I won't.

I should probably use a ten point system...Pitchfork Style (so pretentious, like a 5.7 means so much...5.3, wow, that's WAY different...playing on numerological patterns and our symbolic collective subconscious. Very manipulative) for ease of handling. The Passenger 8.6 L'Eclisse 7.3


YUMI UPDATE

I'm currently working on "Sound Section" 16 out of the 51 sections I divided the film into.

CINEMANOVEL UPDATE

I'm on page 73 of this film script. I'm REALLY looking forward to this one. It's very novelistic, and very much concerned with one central character. A departure for me. She's in every scene, and I enjoy writing this way because you really get to know your character. Now, where can I get in touch with Irene Jacob...

SIDEKICKS UPDATE

Auditions have begun. We're moving ahead with the pilot episode, and then we'll try and sell it or set it up with a broadcaster (hopefully set it up and run it for them!).

V.O.
In my Screenwriting class we had a discussion of Voice Over. In the (recent) past, Voice-Over narration has been given a bad name. I rarely use it in my films, but there's absolutely no reason to avoid it if you know how to write.

A QUICK "off the top of my head" LIST OF FILMS THAT FEATURE VOICE OVER NARRATION

Le Plaisir
Apocalypse Now
L.A. Confidential
Primer
Nine Lives
Jules and Jim
Memento
Taxi Driver
Diary of a Country Priest
Double Indemnity
Days of Heaven
Goodfellas
Barry Lyndon
Sunset Blvd
American Beauty
The Big Lebowski
The Magnificent Ambersons
Lady from Shanghai (welles)
Blade Runner
A Clockwork Orange
Manhattan
Mighty Aphrodite
The Royal Tenenbaums
Adaptation
Contempt
Hiroshima Mon Amour
The Rules of Attraction
The Passion of Anna

Saturday, November 25, 2006







Park Chanwook on his NEXT FILM: "I am a Cyborg"

"It's a love story about a girl who imagines she's a cyborg and a young man in his early 20s with a compulsive theft disorder,and he begins to think that that she can steal the abilities and personalities of other people."

Now, why the hell didn't I think of this. Where's the Collective Unconscious when you really need it.

Can't wait to see it.

FILMS

CODE UNKNOWN by M. Haneke should have been called "Point Unknown" or "Plot Unknown."

DON'T MOVE was fantastic, much like (as Rob pointed out to me) THE SON'S ROOM . So similar, in fact, that I had to check to see if they were made by different directors. The Son's Room and Talk to Her.

THE DOUBLE LIFE OF VERONIQUE

Well, Irene Jacob. Wow. Kieslowski was trying to get at the truth between people, in moments alone, or moments shared (that would NEVER be shared in documentary circumstances). The way he did this, and did this so perfectly was by writing simple moving scenarios (very difficult to write simply) and casting. The actor is everything in Kieslowski. Watch THE RETURN for an example of this attention in a contemporary director (plus The Return is a brilliant film). Irene Jacob's eyes reveal paragraphs of dialogue and movement in a simple look or a slow blink. I'm also struck by how similiar this film is to RED.

Slawomir Idziak shot Veronique and Bleu. I wish he was shooting Cinemanovel...hmmm...is Poland cold in February?

Tuesday, November 21, 2006











R.I.P

Monday, November 20, 2006



My new screenplay:

CINEMANOVEL

Trying to channel the spirit of Kieslowski and Bergman if they met in a South Korea coffee shop to speak with Godard about the nature of coincidence and the legacy of Ozu.

That's all.



The Double Life of Veronique is supposed to be released tomorrow. I shall be at the video shop in the AM.

everything from here

Sunday, November 19, 2006

Stream of consciousness warning. The following have NOT been edited or checked for relevance.

SOME OF THE FILMS I WATCHED (IN ORDER) DURING OUR TOFINO GETAWAY

THE WEATHER MAN

Very good film. Not at all what I expected (thanks Rob). A very good slice of an interesting and authentic life. Authenticity, the thing that most contemporary pictures lack in almost every frame.

HEIGHTS

I was wrong about Heights. I thought I didn’t like it. Although it’s flawed and “over processed” in the writing, it’s actually pretty good. It does, however, take itself a bit more seriously than I think it probably should.

THREE TIMES

A stunning work each and every time. I prefer café lumiere and Millennium Mambo, but the first third of Three Times brings Days of Being Wild immediately to mind (and that’s a very good thing). The last third is very Mambo-esque. The silent film section in the middle relies a bit to heavily on politics for its drama (for me), but it’s still incredible to look at. I’m not sure the middle third brings enough to the overall film to warrant its inclusion over a more interesting possibility. If the intent is to create something bigger in the mind of the audience than the three parts individually provide, I did need a bit more from the middle section. But it’s still a fucking champion film.

SIDEWAYS

Still funny. Thomas Hayden Church is one hell of a character. The script is paced incredibly well, the comedy and drama so well parceled out. If you fast forward the “academy” moment (and YOU HAVE TO), that whole pinot grape speech section with Miles and Maya speaking in ridiculous unrealistic arch poetic “after school special meets General hospital” language, it’s a great film. I’m not crazy about the split screen montage, but that section is so minor and thankfully short.

FORTY SHADES OF BLUE

When you make a film, so many elements have to fall into place to make it a good one. Good casting, good performances by well cast talent, good script, good locations, good weather, good technicians, and good decisions made at good times. This film definitely features some good performances by a cast that, although they are almost perfect in their onscreen performances, are generally miscast. Also, it doesn’t really add up to much, emotionally, until the wife of Rip Torn’s character’s son arrives an hour and twenty minutes in. A watchable film, but, because this is exactly my “type” of film on the surface, I was hoping for more.

C.R.A.Z.Y

This is a Canadian coming of age film. One of the best Canadian films on this subject in any language. Better than Mon Oncle Antoine? Perhaps...

LONESOME JIM

I had heard bad things. They were wrong. This is a much better, a much much better version of Garden State. It’s Garden State, New Waterford Girl, Trees Lounge and The Celebration all wrapped up and delivered in shaky Dogme style by Buscemi. Oh, it also features an interesting drug character (very difficult to pull off today), a cross between Jack Black in Jesus’ Son and Brad Pitt in True Romance.

NO DIRECTION HOME

Bob Zimmerman is cool. A really great candid rock n’ roll hurricane. Could have used WAY MORE 1966-2006 and WAY LESS 1950’s and early 1960’s. Amen.

THE CONSTANT GARDENER

Constantly boring. Never surprising. Couldn’t they have spent all of these millions on medical aid for Africa instead of making some ham-fisted thriller that tells us nothing we don’t understand 100% completely already about how the bad drug companies and the bad governments are out for money, even third world money? Wow. That’s shocking. They’re out for money? Write a cheque to some humanitarian organization and please DO NOT make any more movies like this.

LIE WITH ME

Boring softcore Canadian porn with significantly less gravity/meaning than regular softcore porn, and more cheese than a block of cheddar melted on top of a super size volume of the very worst/best of teen angst poetry. Words cannot describe how absolutely meaningless this film is. But they are all we've got.

DISTANT

Turkish Grand Prix winner at Cannes 2002. Istanbul looks great in the winter. Chilly. The director, Nuri Bilge Ceylan, is a fan of Ozu and Tarkovsky and it shows. It’s not quite The Return, but it’s a VERY well photographed, slow moving, interesting character sketch in a Chekhovian fashion (pass me the Samovar). The inner life of the characters is reflected in the faces of the actors in long still shots. There is very little dialogue and very little that I didn’t love. The director and the notes on the back of the box claim that the film is funny, but I didn’t laugh. I loved it without laughing. Also, I could have used a lot more from the female characters. There were many opportunities to illuminate these interesting Turkish women. This film was shot almost entirely with available light. Fucking beautiful photography. Nuri says he tries to find a “golden point” for the camera. I love this term. There’s one place that the camera belongs for each scene, and only one place. It’s nice to hear somebody else say this.

THE DAY A PIG FELL INTO THE WELL

Hong Sang-Soo is interested in many of the same things I find interesting here and in most of his films. The complicated nature of this film, the way that the characters are related to each other, makes it tough to get during the first few viewings (this is my second).Much isn't revealed (cleared up) until the last quarter of the film. I'll need another couple of passes here.

WOMAN ON THE BEACH (saw this here in Vancouver not in Tofino)

Hong Sang-Soo's latest is almost his best. Turning gate retains the title, but wow...it was close. The first 3 quarters of this film find Sang-Soo in Kieslowski territory. Although, as usual, there is a writer/filmmmaker at the heart of the story, and there are two distinct halves of the film, the poignancy rating is high. The dialogue is almost Godard, the concept Kieslowski, but the framework is standard Hong Sang-Soo. If it wasn't for the ending (which I will not give away here), this would be a perfect film, adultery, love triangle(s), beaches, and coincidences. Top notch.

MAKING A FILM

"Anyone who can make a film, I already love."

John Cassavetes said that, and I get it.

THE HILLS ARE ALIVE

I'm working on some sound editing. I've divided the film into 51 parts (no particular reason, that's just the number of parts) and have started building the sound. Who is going to spend 12 hours a day for 51 days working on my sound for free? Probably only me.

THE FACTS (wouldn't have it any other way...well, maybe one other way where I'm given millions of dollars to spend wisely).

The amount of sheer will that goes into writing 250 drafts of a feature film script, throwing out your favourite parts not once, but hundreds of times...then auditioning 200 people, casting...planning...begging for locations...shotlisting and storyboarding (75 % of which will be thrown out on the day), and then guiding a feature film crew through shooting a film, over a month, sometimes from 8 at night until 8 in the morning...paying for everything yourself on credit cards...sitting in front of a computer for months editing and mixing...I can see what Cassavetes was saying.

If you've believed...if you've created a feature film from out of the ether. If you've scrambled and clawed and screamed and begged and did it because you had a story to tell and not because you think movie sets are cool. I love you too.

It's become much more difficult for me to watch an independently produced/written/directed film and to be critical. When you understand exactly how much work goes into it.

Alternately, it's become increasingly easy to watch films that have larger budgets (anything over 100,000) and be more critical. When you understand exactly how inflated these budgets are and how the majority of them are the result of over "noted/covered" scripts and cautious formulaic committees...these people pay to keep the evil machine running.

THE SAD TRUTH

Give me a million dollar budget and I'll make it look like ten million (that's modest...probably forty million, but let's not get arrogant). I'll take...five and we'll shoot for making it look like twenty-five, how's that?

Back to the headphones.

T

Saturday, November 11, 2006




Lookwell

TV Pilot never picked up. By Robert Smigel and Conan O'Brien

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

INTERESTING FACT

As an independent filmmaker, I read all the indie film magazines, check all the websites, keep up to date in the world. Why is it that every one of these resources, without exception, recommend the Professional Hollywood model, the recipe cards and treatments for writing, the pre-visualization and the shot list for directing (and storyboards), the budget (small but still impressive) for production (often including crew of 10 or more), and the (even larger) post-production budget and workflow.

They parrot each and every one of the above listed techniques and MANY more, which is fine...but...

Their "inspiration list of filmmakers" is always the same: Kevin Smith, Robert Rodriguez, Ed Burns, Shane Carruth, Lars Von Trier, The Blair Witch guys, Open Water, the list goes on, but the one thing ALL these films have in common?

EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THESE FILMS was made by AVOIDING EVERTHING listed in these indie film publications/websites. Outline, recipe cards, full crew, etc...

The secret, it seems to me, is that making an AMAZING independent film means doing NOTHING the way the studios and bigger budget productions do it.

I'll continue to read those publications, because there are the occasional tips (how to make a dolly for cheap, faking the fig rig, dimmers, etc...), but I'm not going to be "wooed" to the darkside of "dependent"(mediocre)filmmaking.

Use your limitations and look at the way the filmmakers you admire make movies.

Do it.